- you don’t use political, monetary or military power ever again to force your opinions through!!!
- it is natural for there to be difference of opinions on important subjects led by “experts ”
- Typical Examples with climate change arguments from both sides
- YUP from NY times ” Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree*: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.
- ” nope ” from phys.org On November 1, AFP joined news outlets around the world in covering the release of a major academic paper warning that our oceans were warming dramatically quicker than previously thought. The study was undertaken by some of the world’s most pre-eminent climate scientists, using state-of-the-art modelling systems reviewed by their peers, and appeared in one of the most prestigious academic journals. There was just one problem: it was wrong. Published in Nature, the paper by researchers from the University of California San Diego and Princeton found that ocean temperatures had warmed 60 percent more than current estimates.
- one possible Solutions to resolve direction we take as a planet, will take several months or longer to complete , something like our recent impeachment trial approach which was very thorough from both sides .
- find the top 100 yeah and nay scientists environmentalists physicists etc etc
- initially prepared over many weeks ahead of time, televised debates between the 12 top yes and 12 top no scientists
- submission of questions from all the other scientists on both sides to their opposing 12
- another televised debate to answer questions asked and rebuttals by the 12 on both sides , it takes as long as it takes .
- results are all posted so anyone can read whats going on
- all of the above is then discussed on platforms like twitter facebook chat rooms etc
- novel new ideas and questions are addressed by the top 100
- world wide, verified, singular vote, by all eligible humans which will also state a short reason they are choosing yes or no, for their vote online as to the direction we will proceed in planning and execution .
- if data and facts change dramatically later the process starts again